Venice edges ahead of Florence on higher occupancy (36% vs 30%), stronger RevPAR (£34 vs £32).
Head-to-head metrics
| Florence | Venice | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 30% | 36% |
| Median daily rate | £116 | £131 |
| Median RevPAR | £32 | £34 |
| Active listings | 10,305 | 6,967 |
| YoY occupancy | +0.4 pts | +6.4 pts |
| YoY daily rate | -8.7% | -13.2% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Florence vs Venice
Venice finishes clearly ahead of Florence on our composite of occupancy, revenue per available night and regulation risk — and it is the calendar rather than the price tag doing the work. Venice's listings run at 36% occupancy against 30% in Florence, worth 6 extra points of booked calendar every year. The twelve-month direction favours Venice too: occupancy there moved +6.4 points while Florence moved +0.4 points. Those gaps are wide enough to survive a normal year's variance.
Venice takes both halves of the yield equation, which is less common than it sounds. It charges more per night — £131 against £116 — and still fills more of the year, 36% against 30%. A market that leads on price and utilisation at once is normally one where demand has outrun supply, rather than one where hosts are discounting to keep the calendar busy. RevPAR reflects the double advantage at £34 against £32.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Florence is not simply the weaker market of the two. Florence is the deeper market at 10,305 active listings against 6,967, which usually means better comparables going in and a wider buyer pool coming out. Florence sits at the cheaper end at £116 a night against £131, which lowers the bar for filling shoulder-season dates and usually tracks a lower purchase price too. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Florence nor Venice currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Florence peaks in October at 65% and bottoms in December at 31.2%; Venice runs from 62.8% in September down to 28.1% in November. Both swing by a similar amount across the year, so neither offers meaningfully steadier cash flow than the other.
Who each suits, then. Florence suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry. Venice answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2025-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 5,209 active Florence listings and 3,599 in Venice.
Frequently asked questions
Is Florence or Venice better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Florence or Venice?
Which has higher nightly rates, Florence or Venice?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Florence or Venice?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Florence or Venice?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Florence vs Venice?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →