Florence edges ahead of Naples on higher occupancy (26.3% vs 16.4%), stronger RevPAR (£45 vs £16).
Head-to-head metrics
| Florence | Naples | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 26.3% | 16.4% |
| Median daily rate | £166 | £94 |
| Median RevPAR | £45 | £16 |
| Active listings | 10,534 | 7,041 |
| YoY occupancy | +0 pts | +0 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +42.3% | +35.8% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Florence vs Naples
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Florence finishes decisively ahead of Naples. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 184.4% higher in Florence: £45 against £16. Florence commands 77.3% more per night, £166 against £94. That is not a rounding difference, and it compounds over a hold period.
Florence takes both halves of the yield equation, which is less common than it sounds. It charges more per night — £166 against £94 — and still fills more of the year, 26.3% against 16.4%. A market that leads on price and utilisation at once is normally one where demand has outrun supply, rather than one where hosts are discounting to keep the calendar busy. RevPAR reflects the double advantage at £45 against £16.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Naples is not simply the weaker market of the two. Naples is the less crowded of the two — 7,041 active listings to 10,534 — so a well-run property has fewer near-identical rivals to out-rank. Naples sits at the cheaper end at £94 a night against £166, which lowers the bar for filling shoulder-season dates and usually tracks a lower purchase price too. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Florence nor Naples currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Florence peaks in October at 64.8% and bottoms in December at 30.5%; Naples runs from 54% in September down to 17.2% in November. Both swing by a similar amount across the year, so neither offers meaningfully steadier cash flow than the other.
Who each suits, then. Florence suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry. Naples answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2026-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 10,534 active Florence listings and 7,041 in Naples.
Frequently asked questions
Is Florence or Naples better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Florence or Naples?
Which has higher nightly rates, Florence or Naples?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Florence or Naples?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Florence or Naples?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Florence vs Naples?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →