Naples edges ahead of Puglia on higher occupancy (24% vs 18%), stronger RevPAR (£12 vs £5).
Head-to-head metrics
| Naples | Puglia | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 24% | 18% |
| Median daily rate | £69 | £72 |
| Median RevPAR | £12 | £5 |
| Active listings | 6,595 | 23,576 |
| YoY occupancy | +9.2 pts | +11.4 pts |
| YoY daily rate | -3.6% | +2.4% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Naples vs Puglia
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Naples finishes clearly ahead of Puglia. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 129% higher in Naples: £12 against £5. Naples's listings run at 24% occupancy against 18% in Puglia, worth 6 extra points of booked calendar every year. Those gaps are wide enough to survive a normal year's variance.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Puglia is the rate market: £72 a night against £69, some 4.9% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 18% occupancy. Naples is the volume market, filling 24% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £12 in Naples against £5. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Puglia is not simply the weaker market of the two. Puglia's calendar is the flatter of the two — 8.3 points between its best and worst month against 30.6 in Naples — which makes debt service easier to underwrite. Puglia is the deeper market at 23,576 active listings against 6,595, which usually means better comparables going in and a wider buyer pool coming out. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Naples nor Puglia currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Naples peaks in September at 53.4% and bottoms in November at 22.8%; Puglia runs from 47.3% in August down to 39% in June. Puglia is the steadier of the two at 8.3 points peak-to-trough against 30.6 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Naples concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. Naples suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry. Puglia answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2025-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 4,139 active Naples listings and 20,801 in Puglia.
Frequently asked questions
Is Naples or Puglia better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Naples or Puglia?
Which has higher nightly rates, Naples or Puglia?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Naples or Puglia?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Naples or Puglia?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Naples vs Puglia?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →