Rome edges ahead of Hawaii on higher occupancy (26.3% vs 15.9%).
Head-to-head metrics
| Hawaii | Rome | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 15.9% | 26.3% |
| Median daily rate | £284 | £159 |
| Median RevPAR | £46 | £41 |
| Active listings | 23,915 | 27,717 |
| YoY occupancy | -0.5 pts | +3.3 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +72.6% | +45% |
| Regulation risk | — | medium |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Hawaii vs Rome
Rome finishes decisively ahead of Hawaii on our composite of occupancy, revenue per available night and regulation risk — and it is the calendar rather than the price tag doing the work. Rome sells 10.4 more points of its calendar — 26.3% median occupancy against 15.9% in Hawaii. The twelve-month direction favours Rome too: occupancy there moved +3.3 points while Hawaii moved −0.5 points. That is not a rounding difference, and it compounds over a hold period.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Hawaii is the rate market: £284 a night against £159, some 78.3% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 15.9% occupancy. Rome is the volume market, filling 26.3% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £46 in Hawaii against £41. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Hawaii is not simply the weaker market of the two. Hawaii commands 78.3% more per night, £284 against £159. Nightly rates are also climbing faster in Hawaii, +72.6% over the last year against +45% in Rome. If your model leans on nightly rate rather than volume, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
We hold a verified regulation record for only one side of this pairing. Rome applies no annual night cap and requires registration but no licence, on a medium risk rating. Hawaii should be read as unverified rather than unregulated: check the local authority's own register before you underwrite anything there.
The two calendars also behave differently. Hawaii peaks in October at 49.4% and bottoms in May at 28.6%; Rome runs from 67.3% in October down to 28.9% in February. Hawaii is the steadier of the two at 20.8 points peak-to-trough against 38.4 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Rome concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. Hawaii suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry and who can hold rate through the shoulder season rather than discounting to fill the calendar. Rome answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal: it is the market for an owner whose economics survive high turnover — more bookings, more cleans, more guest contact per pound of revenue. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2026-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 23,915 active Hawaii listings and 27,717 in Rome.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hawaii or Rome better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Hawaii or Rome?
Which has higher nightly rates, Hawaii or Rome?
Is Hawaii or Rome riskier for Airbnb regulation?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Hawaii or Rome?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Hawaii or Rome?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →