Chicago edges ahead of Clark County Nv on higher occupancy (35.1% vs 21.4%), stronger RevPAR (£59 vs £33).
Head-to-head metrics
| Chicago | Clark County Nv | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 35.1% | 21.4% |
| Median daily rate | £171 | £172 |
| Median RevPAR | £59 | £33 |
| Active listings | 6,325 | 10,915 |
| YoY occupancy | +2.2 pts | -3.3 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +53.9% | +55.7% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Chicago vs Clark County Nv
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Chicago finishes decisively ahead of Clark County Nv. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 82% higher in Chicago: £59 against £33. Chicago sells 13.7 more points of its calendar — 35.1% median occupancy against 21.4% in Clark County Nv. That is not a rounding difference, and it compounds over a hold period.
On the mechanics of the yield the two are hard to separate. Chicago runs 35.1% occupancy at £171 a night; Clark County Nv runs 21.4% at £172. That leaves RevPAR almost level too — £59 against £33 — so operating quality, not market selection, is what will decide your return between these two.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Clark County Nv is not simply the weaker market of the two. Clark County Nv is the deeper market at 10,915 active listings against 6,325, which usually means better comparables going in and a wider buyer pool coming out. Clark County Nv's calendar is the flatter of the two — 21.9 points between its best and worst month against 29.9 in Chicago — which makes debt service easier to underwrite. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Chicago nor Clark County Nv currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Chicago peaks in September at 54% and bottoms in February at 24.1%; Clark County Nv runs from 52.8% in August down to 30.9% in November. Clark County Nv is the steadier of the two at 21.9 points peak-to-trough against 29.9 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Chicago concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. Chicago suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Clark County Nv answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal. It is the contrarian side: buying it means buying a market that has cooled. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2026-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 6,325 active Chicago listings and 10,915 in Clark County Nv.
Frequently asked questions
Is Chicago or Clark County Nv better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Chicago or Clark County Nv?
Which has higher nightly rates, Chicago or Clark County Nv?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Chicago or Clark County Nv?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Chicago or Clark County Nv?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Chicago vs Clark County Nv?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →