Paris edges ahead of Bordeaux on higher occupancy (42% vs 30%), stronger RevPAR (£31 vs £12).
Head-to-head metrics
| Bordeaux | Paris | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 30% | 42% |
| Median daily rate | £65 | £113 |
| Median RevPAR | £12 | £31 |
| Active listings | 6,866 | 45,137 |
| YoY occupancy | +8.6 pts | +25.6 pts |
| YoY daily rate | -7.3% | -13.6% |
| Regulation risk | — | high |
| Annual night cap | None | 120 |
| License required | No | Yes |
Full analysis: Bordeaux vs Paris
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Paris finishes decisively ahead of Bordeaux. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 158.6% higher in Paris: £31 against £12. Paris sells 12 more points of its calendar — 42% median occupancy against 30% in Bordeaux. That is not a rounding difference, and it compounds over a hold period.
Paris takes both halves of the yield equation, which is less common than it sounds. It charges more per night — £113 against £65 — and still fills more of the year, 42% against 30%. A market that leads on price and utilisation at once is normally one where demand has outrun supply, rather than one where hosts are discounting to keep the calendar busy. RevPAR reflects the double advantage at £31 against £12.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Bordeaux is not simply the weaker market of the two. Nightly rates are also climbing faster in Bordeaux, −7.3% over the last year against −13.6% in Paris. Bordeaux is the less crowded of the two — 6,866 active listings to 45,137 — so a well-run property has fewer near-identical rivals to out-rank. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
We hold a verified regulation record for only one side of this pairing. Paris caps entire-home letting at 120 nights a year, requires a licence, and treats letting as a change of use needing planning permission, on a high risk rating. Bordeaux should be read as unverified rather than unregulated: check the local authority's own register before you underwrite anything there.
The two calendars also behave differently. Bordeaux peaks in September at 70.7% and bottoms in February at 55.6%; Paris runs from 70.6% in July down to 58% in January. Both swing by a similar amount across the year, so neither offers meaningfully steadier cash flow than the other.
Who each suits, then. Bordeaux suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry. Paris suits an owner who expects to use the property personally for part of the year, or to run a hybrid calendar around the 120-night ceiling. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 4,673 active Bordeaux listings and 23,404 in Paris.
Frequently asked questions
Is Bordeaux or Paris better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Bordeaux or Paris?
Which has higher nightly rates, Bordeaux or Paris?
Is Bordeaux or Paris riskier for Airbnb regulation?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Bordeaux or Paris?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Bordeaux or Paris?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →