Toronto edges ahead of Victoria on higher occupancy (56% vs 48%).
Head-to-head metrics
| Toronto | Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 56% | 48% |
| Median daily rate | £75 | £93 |
| Median RevPAR | £25 | £36 |
| Active listings | 11,370 | 2,586 |
| YoY occupancy | +23.1 pts | +13.5 pts |
| YoY daily rate | -3.7% | +0.6% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Toronto vs Victoria
Toronto finishes clearly ahead of Victoria on our composite of occupancy, revenue per available night and regulation risk — and it is the calendar rather than the price tag doing the work. Toronto's listings run at 56% occupancy against 48% in Victoria, worth 8 extra points of booked calendar every year. The twelve-month direction favours Toronto too: occupancy there moved +23.1 points while Victoria moved +13.5 points. Those gaps are wide enough to survive a normal year's variance.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Victoria is the rate market: £93 a night against £75, some 23.1% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 48% occupancy. Toronto is the volume market, filling 56% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £36 in Victoria against £25. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Victoria is not simply the weaker market of the two. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 47.6% higher in Victoria: £36 against £25. Across a full year the median Victoria listing grosses £13,311 against £9,022 in Toronto. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Toronto nor Victoria currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Toronto peaks in September at 62.7% and bottoms in January at 39.2%; Victoria runs from 56.6% in October down to 39.6% in May. Victoria is the steadier of the two at 17 points peak-to-trough against 23.5 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Toronto concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. Toronto suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry and whose economics survive high turnover — more bookings, more cleans, more guest contact per pound of revenue. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Victoria answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal: it is the market for an owner who can hold rate through the shoulder season rather than discounting to fill the calendar. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 4,206 active Toronto listings and 866 in Victoria.
Frequently asked questions
Is Toronto or Victoria better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Toronto or Victoria?
Which has higher nightly rates, Toronto or Victoria?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Toronto or Victoria?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Toronto or Victoria?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Toronto vs Victoria?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →