Vancouver edges ahead of Toronto on higher occupancy (36.2% vs 30.7%), stronger RevPAR (£55 vs £31).
Head-to-head metrics
| Toronto | Vancouver | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 30.7% | 36.2% |
| Median daily rate | £114 | £175 |
| Median RevPAR | £31 | £55 |
| Active listings | 12,844 | 4,491 |
| YoY occupancy | -0.5 pts | -13.1 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +36.7% | +55.2% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Toronto vs Vancouver
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Vancouver finishes clearly ahead of Toronto. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 80.2% higher in Vancouver: £55 against £31. Vancouver commands 52.9% more per night, £175 against £114. Those gaps are wide enough to survive a normal year's variance.
Vancouver takes both halves of the yield equation, which is less common than it sounds. It charges more per night — £175 against £114 — and still fills more of the year, 36.2% against 30.7%. A market that leads on price and utilisation at once is normally one where demand has outrun supply, rather than one where hosts are discounting to keep the calendar busy. RevPAR reflects the double advantage at £55 against £31.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Toronto is not simply the weaker market of the two. The twelve-month direction favours Toronto too: occupancy there moved −0.5 points while Vancouver moved −13.1 points. Toronto is the deeper market at 12,844 active listings against 4,491, which usually means better comparables going in and a wider buyer pool coming out. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Toronto nor Vancouver currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Toronto peaks in September at 63.2% and bottoms in February at 37.8%; Vancouver runs from 66.9% in September down to 40.1% in November. Both swing by a similar amount across the year, so neither offers meaningfully steadier cash flow than the other.
Who each suits, then. Toronto suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry. Vancouver answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal. It is the contrarian side: buying it means buying a market that has cooled. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2026-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 12,844 active Toronto listings and 4,491 in Vancouver.
Frequently asked questions
Is Toronto or Vancouver better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Toronto or Vancouver?
Which has higher nightly rates, Toronto or Vancouver?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Toronto or Vancouver?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Toronto or Vancouver?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Toronto vs Vancouver?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →