Quebec City edges ahead of Toronto on higher occupancy (62% vs 56%), stronger RevPAR (£30 vs £25).
Head-to-head metrics
| Quebec City | Toronto | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 62% | 56% |
| Median daily rate | £70 | £75 |
| Median RevPAR | £30 | £25 |
| Active listings | 1,884 | 11,370 |
| YoY occupancy | +11 pts | +23.1 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +11% | -3.7% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Quebec City vs Toronto
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Quebec City finishes clearly ahead of Toronto. Quebec City turns its rate and occupancy into £30 per available night against £25 in Toronto, a 19.7% edge on the only yield figure that nets the empty nights out. Quebec City's listings run at 62% occupancy against 56% in Toronto, worth 6 extra points of booked calendar every year. Those gaps are wide enough to survive a normal year's variance.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Toronto is the rate market: £75 a night against £70, some 7.4% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 56% occupancy. Quebec City is the volume market, filling 62% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £30 in Quebec City against £25. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Toronto is not simply the weaker market of the two. The twelve-month direction favours Toronto too: occupancy there moved +23.1 points while Quebec City moved +11 points. Toronto is the deeper market at 11,370 active listings against 1,884, which usually means better comparables going in and a wider buyer pool coming out. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Quebec City nor Toronto currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Quebec City peaks in November at 50.3% and bottoms in April at 26.7%; Toronto runs from 62.7% in September down to 39.2% in January. Both swing by a similar amount across the year, so neither offers meaningfully steadier cash flow than the other.
Who each suits, then. Quebec City suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry and whose economics survive high turnover — more bookings, more cleans, more guest contact per pound of revenue. Toronto answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal: it is the market for an owner who can hold rate through the shoulder season rather than discounting to fill the calendar. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2025-11, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 581 active Quebec City listings and 4,206 in Toronto.
Frequently asked questions
Is Quebec City or Toronto better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Quebec City or Toronto?
Which has higher nightly rates, Quebec City or Toronto?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Quebec City or Toronto?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Quebec City or Toronto?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Quebec City vs Toronto?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →