Quebec City edges ahead of Toronto on higher occupancy (34.5% vs 30.7%), stronger RevPAR (£44 vs £31).
Head-to-head metrics
| Quebec City | Toronto | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 34.5% | 30.7% |
| Median daily rate | £151 | £114 |
| Median RevPAR | £44 | £31 |
| Active listings | 1,999 | 12,844 |
| YoY occupancy | -9.9 pts | -0.5 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +61.3% | +36.7% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Quebec City vs Toronto
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Quebec City finishes clearly ahead of Toronto. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 43.9% higher in Quebec City: £44 against £31. Quebec City commands 31.9% more per night, £151 against £114. Those gaps are wide enough to survive a normal year's variance.
Quebec City takes both halves of the yield equation, which is less common than it sounds. It charges more per night — £151 against £114 — and still fills more of the year, 34.5% against 30.7%. A market that leads on price and utilisation at once is normally one where demand has outrun supply, rather than one where hosts are discounting to keep the calendar busy. RevPAR reflects the double advantage at £44 against £31.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Toronto is not simply the weaker market of the two. The twelve-month direction favours Toronto too: occupancy there moved −0.5 points while Quebec City moved −9.9 points. Toronto is the deeper market at 12,844 active listings against 1,999, which usually means better comparables going in and a wider buyer pool coming out. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Quebec City nor Toronto currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Quebec City peaks in October at 58.9% and bottoms in January at 27.9%; Toronto runs from 63.2% in September down to 37.8% in February. Toronto is the steadier of the two at 25.4 points peak-to-trough against 31 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Quebec City concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. Quebec City suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry. It is the contrarian side: buying it means buying a market that has cooled. Toronto answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2026-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 1,999 active Quebec City listings and 12,844 in Toronto.
Frequently asked questions
Is Quebec City or Toronto better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Quebec City or Toronto?
Which has higher nightly rates, Quebec City or Toronto?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Quebec City or Toronto?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Quebec City or Toronto?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Quebec City vs Toronto?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →