Sicily edges ahead of Puglia on higher occupancy (24% vs 18%), stronger RevPAR (£7 vs £5).
Head-to-head metrics
| Puglia | Sicily | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 18% | 24% |
| Median daily rate | £72 | £69 |
| Median RevPAR | £5 | £7 |
| Active listings | 23,576 | 29,746 |
| YoY occupancy | +11.4 pts | — |
| YoY daily rate | +2.4% | — |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Puglia vs Sicily
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Sicily finishes clearly ahead of Puglia. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 35.5% higher in Sicily: £7 against £5. Sicily's listings run at 24% occupancy against 18% in Puglia, worth 6 extra points of booked calendar every year. Those gaps are wide enough to survive a normal year's variance.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Puglia is the rate market: £72 a night against £69, some 4.9% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 18% occupancy. Sicily is the volume market, filling 24% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £7 in Sicily against £5. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Puglia is not simply the weaker market of the two. Puglia's calendar is the flatter of the two — 8.3 points between its best and worst month against 14.3 in Sicily — which makes debt service easier to underwrite. Its strongest submarket, Faeto, clears £32 RevPAR on its own — city medians hide that kind of spread. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Puglia nor Sicily currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Puglia peaks in August at 47.3% and bottoms in June at 39%; Sicily runs from 43.2% in August down to 28.9% in November. Puglia is the steadier of the two at 8.3 points peak-to-trough against 14.3 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Sicily concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. Puglia suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry. Sicily answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2025-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 20,801 active Puglia listings and 23,804 in Sicily.
Frequently asked questions
Is Puglia or Sicily better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Puglia or Sicily?
Which has higher nightly rates, Puglia or Sicily?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Puglia or Sicily?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Puglia or Sicily?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Puglia vs Sicily?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →