Puglia and Sicily score similarly on the metrics that matter most for short-term rental returns. The right pick depends on whether you optimise for yield (lower regulation risk, higher RevPAR) or capital growth.
Head-to-head metrics
| Puglia | Sicily | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 6.6% | 8.2% |
| Median daily rate | £100 | £97 |
| Median RevPAR | £8 | £10 |
| Active listings | 24,702 | 30,526 |
| YoY occupancy | +0 pts | +0 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +38.2% | +41.4% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Puglia vs Sicily
There is no clean winner between Puglia and Sicily. Puglia posts 6.6% occupancy and £8 RevPAR; Sicily posts 8.2% occupancy and £10 RevPAR. Weighted together with regulation risk the two finish inside the margin we are willing to call, which is the honest answer rather than an evasive one — a scoring gap this small would flip on the next data refresh. When markets are this close the decision stops being about the market and starts being about the deal: what you pay, what it costs to run, and how quickly you could exit.
On the mechanics of the yield the two are hard to separate. Puglia runs 6.6% occupancy at £100 a night; Sicily runs 8.2% at £97. That leaves RevPAR almost level too — £10 against £8 — so operating quality, not market selection, is what will decide your return between these two.
A tie does not mean the two are interchangeable — it means each holds something the other does not. Its strongest submarket, San Marzano di San Giuseppe, clears £31 RevPAR on its own — city medians hide that kind of spread. Across a full year the median Sicily listing grosses £3,580 against £2,841 in Puglia. Pick the one whose advantage matches how you intend to operate, because the composite score will not do that job for you.
Neither Puglia nor Sicily currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Puglia peaks in August at 49.3% and bottoms in November at 39.3%; Sicily runs from 43.5% in September down to 28.9% in November. Puglia is the steadier of the two at 10 points peak-to-trough against 14.6 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Sicily concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. Puglia suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry. Sicily answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2026-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 24,702 active Puglia listings and 30,526 in Sicily.
Frequently asked questions
Is Puglia or Sicily better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Puglia or Sicily?
Which has higher nightly rates, Puglia or Sicily?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Puglia or Sicily?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Puglia or Sicily?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Puglia vs Sicily?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →