Ottawa edges ahead of Toronto on higher occupancy (60% vs 56%).
Head-to-head metrics
| Ottawa | Toronto | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 60% | 56% |
| Median daily rate | £64 | £75 |
| Median RevPAR | £24 | £25 |
| Active listings | 1,888 | 11,370 |
| YoY occupancy | +25.5 pts | +23.1 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +2.8% | -3.7% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Ottawa vs Toronto
Ottawa finishes narrowly ahead of Toronto on our composite of occupancy, revenue per available night and regulation risk — and it is the calendar rather than the price tag doing the work. Ottawa's listings run at 60% occupancy against 56% in Toronto, worth 4 extra points of booked calendar every year. Nightly rates are also climbing faster in Ottawa, +2.8% over the last year against −3.7% in Toronto. The margin is thin enough that a single strong year in Toronto would close it, so treat the ordering as a lean rather than a verdict.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Toronto is the rate market: £75 a night against £64, some 18.2% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 56% occupancy. Ottawa is the volume market, filling 60% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £25 in Toronto against £24. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Toronto is not simply the weaker market of the two. Nightly rates favour Toronto: £75 against £64 in Ottawa, a 18.2% premium. Toronto is the deeper market at 11,370 active listings against 1,888, which usually means better comparables going in and a wider buyer pool coming out. If your model leans on nightly rate rather than volume, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Ottawa nor Toronto currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Ottawa peaks in September at 53.8% and bottoms in February at 29.6%; Toronto runs from 62.7% in September down to 39.2% in January. Both swing by a similar amount across the year, so neither offers meaningfully steadier cash flow than the other.
Who each suits, then. Ottawa suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry and whose economics survive high turnover — more bookings, more cleans, more guest contact per pound of revenue. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Toronto answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal: it is the market for an owner who can hold rate through the shoulder season rather than discounting to fill the calendar. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 707 active Ottawa listings and 4,206 in Toronto.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ottawa or Toronto better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Ottawa or Toronto?
Which has higher nightly rates, Ottawa or Toronto?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Ottawa or Toronto?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Ottawa or Toronto?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Ottawa vs Toronto?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →