Nashville edges ahead of Newark on higher occupancy (48% vs 30%), stronger RevPAR (£44 vs £16).
Head-to-head metrics
| Nashville | Newark | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 48% | 30% |
| Median daily rate | £127 | £77 |
| Median RevPAR | £44 | £16 |
| Active listings | 7,697 | 1,455 |
| YoY occupancy | +15.1 pts | — |
| YoY daily rate | -6.4% | — |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Nashville vs Newark
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Nashville finishes decisively ahead of Newark. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 166.7% higher in Nashville: £44 against £16. Nashville sells 18 more points of its calendar — 48% median occupancy against 30% in Newark. That is not a rounding difference, and it compounds over a hold period.
Nashville takes both halves of the yield equation, which is less common than it sounds. It charges more per night — £127 against £77 — and still fills more of the year, 48% against 30%. A market that leads on price and utilisation at once is normally one where demand has outrun supply, rather than one where hosts are discounting to keep the calendar busy. RevPAR reflects the double advantage at £44 against £16.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Newark is not simply the weaker market of the two. Newark's calendar is the flatter of the two — 22.2 points between its best and worst month against 31 in Nashville — which makes debt service easier to underwrite. Newark is the less crowded of the two — 1,455 active listings to 7,697 — so a well-run property has fewer near-identical rivals to out-rank. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Nashville nor Newark currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Nashville peaks in October at 50.8% and bottoms in January at 19.8%; Newark runs from 43.5% in September down to 21.3% in February. Newark is the steadier of the two at 22.2 points peak-to-trough against 31 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Nashville concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. Nashville suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry. Newark answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2025-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 3,438 active Nashville listings and 818 in Newark.
Frequently asked questions
Is Nashville or Newark better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Nashville or Newark?
Which has higher nightly rates, Nashville or Newark?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Nashville or Newark?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Nashville or Newark?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Nashville vs Newark?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →