San Diego edges ahead of Hawaii on higher occupancy (48% vs 30%), stronger RevPAR (£80 vs £47).
Head-to-head metrics
| Hawaii | San Diego | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 30% | 48% |
| Median daily rate | £286 | £275 |
| Median RevPAR | £47 | £80 |
| Active listings | 23,973 | 9,600 |
| YoY occupancy | +2 pts | +0 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +63.8% | +65% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Hawaii vs San Diego
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — San Diego finishes decisively ahead of Hawaii. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 71% higher in San Diego: £80 against £47. San Diego sells 18 more points of its calendar — 48% median occupancy against 30% in Hawaii. That is not a rounding difference, and it compounds over a hold period.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Hawaii is the rate market: £286 a night against £275, some 4% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 30% occupancy. San Diego is the volume market, filling 48% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £80 in San Diego against £47. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Hawaii is not simply the weaker market of the two. Hawaii's calendar is the flatter of the two — 23.7 points between its best and worst month against 36.7 in San Diego — which makes debt service easier to underwrite. Hawaii is the deeper market at 23,973 active listings against 9,600, which usually means better comparables going in and a wider buyer pool coming out. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Hawaii nor San Diego currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Hawaii peaks in July at 54% and bottoms in May at 30.3%; San Diego runs from 68.1% in July down to 31.4% in December. Hawaii is the steadier of the two at 23.7 points peak-to-trough against 36.7 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while San Diego concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. Hawaii suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry. It is also the momentum side of this pair. San Diego answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2026-06, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 16,032 active Hawaii listings and 4,235 in San Diego.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hawaii or San Diego better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Hawaii or San Diego?
Which has higher nightly rates, Hawaii or San Diego?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Hawaii or San Diego?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Hawaii or San Diego?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Hawaii vs San Diego?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →