New York City edges ahead of Hawaii on higher occupancy (60% vs 30%), stronger RevPAR (£47 vs £29).
Head-to-head metrics
| Hawaii | New York City | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 30% | 60% |
| Median daily rate | £164 | £117 |
| Median RevPAR | £29 | £47 |
| Active listings | 22,154 | 10,918 |
| YoY occupancy | +11.9 pts | — |
| YoY daily rate | +1.5% | — |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Hawaii vs New York City
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — New York City finishes decisively ahead of Hawaii. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 62.6% higher in New York City: £47 against £29. New York City sells 30 more points of its calendar — 60% median occupancy against 30% in Hawaii. That is not a rounding difference, and it compounds over a hold period.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Hawaii is the rate market: £164 a night against £117, some 40.5% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 30% occupancy. New York City is the volume market, filling 60% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £47 in New York City against £29. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Hawaii is not simply the weaker market of the two. Hawaii commands 40.5% more per night, £164 against £117. Hawaii is the deeper market at 22,154 active listings against 10,918, which usually means better comparables going in and a wider buyer pool coming out. If your model leans on nightly rate rather than volume, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Hawaii nor New York City currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Hawaii peaks in October at 48% and bottoms in May at 26.5%; New York City runs from 67% in November down to 47.3% in January. Both swing by a similar amount across the year, so neither offers meaningfully steadier cash flow than the other.
Who each suits, then. Hawaii suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry and who can hold rate through the shoulder season rather than discounting to fill the calendar. New York City answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal: it is the market for an owner whose economics survive high turnover — more bookings, more cleans, more guest contact per pound of revenue. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 14,266 active Hawaii listings and 3,530 in New York City.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hawaii or New York City better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Hawaii or New York City?
Which has higher nightly rates, Hawaii or New York City?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Hawaii or New York City?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Hawaii or New York City?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Hawaii vs New York City?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →