Nashville edges ahead of Hawaii on higher occupancy (48% vs 30%), stronger RevPAR (£44 vs £29).
Head-to-head metrics
| Hawaii | Nashville | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 30% | 48% |
| Median daily rate | £164 | £127 |
| Median RevPAR | £29 | £44 |
| Active listings | 22,154 | 7,697 |
| YoY occupancy | +11.9 pts | +15.1 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +1.5% | -6.4% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Hawaii vs Nashville
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Nashville finishes decisively ahead of Hawaii. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 51.6% higher in Nashville: £44 against £29. Nashville sells 18 more points of its calendar — 48% median occupancy against 30% in Hawaii. That is not a rounding difference, and it compounds over a hold period.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Hawaii is the rate market: £164 a night against £127, some 29.2% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 30% occupancy. Nashville is the volume market, filling 48% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £44 in Nashville against £29. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Hawaii is not simply the weaker market of the two. Hawaii commands 29.2% more per night, £164 against £127. Hawaii is the deeper market at 22,154 active listings against 7,697, which usually means better comparables going in and a wider buyer pool coming out. If your model leans on nightly rate rather than volume, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Hawaii nor Nashville currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Hawaii peaks in October at 48% and bottoms in May at 26.5%; Nashville runs from 50.8% in October down to 19.8% in January. Hawaii is the steadier of the two at 21.5 points peak-to-trough against 31 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Nashville concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. Hawaii suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry and who can hold rate through the shoulder season rather than discounting to fill the calendar. Nashville answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal: it is the market for an owner whose economics survive high turnover — more bookings, more cleans, more guest contact per pound of revenue. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2025-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 14,266 active Hawaii listings and 3,438 in Nashville.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hawaii or Nashville better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Hawaii or Nashville?
Which has higher nightly rates, Hawaii or Nashville?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Hawaii or Nashville?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Hawaii or Nashville?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Hawaii vs Nashville?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →