Los Angeles edges ahead of Hawaii on higher occupancy (54% vs 30%), stronger RevPAR (£34 vs £29).
Head-to-head metrics
| Hawaii | Los Angeles | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 30% | 54% |
| Median daily rate | £164 | £122 |
| Median RevPAR | £29 | £34 |
| Active listings | 22,154 | 23,969 |
| YoY occupancy | +11.9 pts | — |
| YoY daily rate | +1.5% | — |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Hawaii vs Los Angeles
Los Angeles finishes decisively ahead of Hawaii on our composite of occupancy, revenue per available night and regulation risk — and it is the calendar rather than the price tag doing the work. Los Angeles sells 24 more points of its calendar — 54% median occupancy against 30% in Hawaii. Los Angeles turns its rate and occupancy into £34 per available night against £29 in Hawaii, a 17.3% edge on the only yield figure that nets the empty nights out. That is not a rounding difference, and it compounds over a hold period.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Hawaii is the rate market: £164 a night against £122, some 35.1% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 30% occupancy. Los Angeles is the volume market, filling 54% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £34 in Los Angeles against £29. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Hawaii is not simply the weaker market of the two. Hawaii commands 35.1% more per night, £164 against £122. Its strongest submarket, Lanai, clears £98 RevPAR on its own — city medians hide that kind of spread. If your model leans on nightly rate rather than volume, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Hawaii nor Los Angeles currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Hawaii peaks in October at 48% and bottoms in May at 26.5%; Los Angeles runs from 52.2% in August down to 30.5% in January. Both swing by a similar amount across the year, so neither offers meaningfully steadier cash flow than the other.
Who each suits, then. Hawaii suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry and who can hold rate through the shoulder season rather than discounting to fill the calendar. Los Angeles answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal: it is the market for an owner whose economics survive high turnover — more bookings, more cleans, more guest contact per pound of revenue. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 14,266 active Hawaii listings and 11,708 in Los Angeles.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hawaii or Los Angeles better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Hawaii or Los Angeles?
Which has higher nightly rates, Hawaii or Los Angeles?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Hawaii or Los Angeles?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Hawaii or Los Angeles?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Hawaii vs Los Angeles?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →