Geneva edges ahead of Vaud on higher occupancy (30% vs 24%), stronger RevPAR (£14 vs £12).
Head-to-head metrics
| Geneva | Vaud | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 30% | 24% |
| Median daily rate | £98 | £106 |
| Median RevPAR | £14 | £12 |
| Active listings | 1,415 | 2,831 |
| YoY occupancy | +10.3 pts | +12.5 pts |
| YoY daily rate | -2.7% | +0.4% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Geneva vs Vaud
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Geneva finishes clearly ahead of Vaud. Geneva turns its rate and occupancy into £14 per available night against £12 in Vaud, a 20% edge on the only yield figure that nets the empty nights out. Geneva's listings run at 30% occupancy against 24% in Vaud, worth 6 extra points of booked calendar every year. Those gaps are wide enough to survive a normal year's variance.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Vaud is the rate market: £106 a night against £98, some 8.3% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 24% occupancy. Geneva is the volume market, filling 30% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £14 in Geneva against £12. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Vaud is not simply the weaker market of the two. Vaud is the deeper market at 2,831 active listings against 1,415, which usually means better comparables going in and a wider buyer pool coming out. The twelve-month direction favours Vaud too: occupancy there moved +12.5 points while Geneva moved +10.3 points. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Geneva nor Vaud currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Geneva peaks in September at 65.4% and bottoms in December at 50.9%; Vaud runs from 60.4% in August down to 46.4% in April. Both swing by a similar amount across the year, so neither offers meaningfully steadier cash flow than the other.
Who each suits, then. Geneva suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry and whose economics survive high turnover — more bookings, more cleans, more guest contact per pound of revenue. Vaud answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal: it is the market for an owner who can hold rate through the shoulder season rather than discounting to fill the calendar. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 1,005 active Geneva listings and 2,224 in Vaud.
Frequently asked questions
Is Geneva or Vaud better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Geneva or Vaud?
Which has higher nightly rates, Geneva or Vaud?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Geneva or Vaud?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Geneva or Vaud?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Geneva vs Vaud?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →