Fort Worth vs Hawaii: which is better for Airbnb investment? (2026)

Bottom line

Fort Worth edges ahead of Hawaii on higher occupancy (42% vs 30%).

Head-to-head metrics

	Fort Worth	Hawaii
Median occupancy	42%	30%
Median daily rate	£92	£164
Median RevPAR	£28	£29
Active listings	1,490	22,154
YoY occupancy	+9.1 pts	+11.9 pts
YoY daily rate	-8.6%	+1.5%
Regulation risk	—	—
Annual night cap	None	None
License required	No	No

Full analysis: Fort Worth vs Hawaii

Fort Worth finishes clearly ahead of Hawaii on our composite of occupancy, revenue per available night and regulation risk — and it is the calendar rather than the price tag doing the work. Fort Worth sells 12 more points of its calendar — 42% median occupancy against 30% in Hawaii. Fort Worth is the less crowded of the two — 1,490 active listings to 22,154 — so a well-run property has fewer near-identical rivals to out-rank. Those gaps are wide enough to survive a normal year's variance.

The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Hawaii is the rate market: £164 a night against £92, some 77.8% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 30% occupancy. Fort Worth is the volume market, filling 42% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £29 in Hawaii against £28. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.

That verdict needs a caveat, because Hawaii is not simply the weaker market of the two. Hawaii commands 77.8% more per night, £164 against £92. Hawaii is the deeper market at 22,154 active listings against 1,490, which usually means better comparables going in and a wider buyer pool coming out. If your model leans on nightly rate rather than volume, the ordering above can reasonably flip.

Neither Fort Worth nor Hawaii currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.

The two calendars also behave differently. Fort Worth peaks in September at 49.3% and bottoms in February at 25.1%; Hawaii runs from 48% in October down to 26.5% in May. Both swing by a similar amount across the year, so neither offers meaningfully steadier cash flow than the other.

Who each suits, then. Fort Worth suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry and whose economics survive high turnover — more bookings, more cleans, more guest contact per pound of revenue. Hawaii answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal: it is the market for an owner who can hold rate through the shoulder season rather than discounting to fill the calendar. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2025-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 698 active Fort Worth listings and 14,266 in Hawaii.

Frequently asked questions

Is Fort Worth or Hawaii better for Airbnb investment?

Fort Worth, on the data we track. It leads on higher occupancy (42% vs 30%), a thinner competitive field (1,490 vs 22,154 active listings), and a lower price point (£92 a night vs £164). Hawaii is not the weak side of this pair, though — it wins on a higher nightly rate (£164 vs £92).

Which has higher occupancy, Fort Worth or Hawaii?

Fort Worth, at 42% median occupancy against 30% in Hawaii — a gap of 12 points. That is a wide spread by short-term rental standards and usually reflects a structural demand difference rather than better hosting. Over the last twelve months Fort Worth gained 9.1 points and Hawaii gained 11.9 points, so the gap is closing.

Which has higher nightly rates, Fort Worth or Hawaii?

Hawaii, at £164 a night against £92 in Fort Worth — roughly 77.8% more. Revenue per available night agrees rather than contradicts: £29 in Hawaii against £28, so the rate premium survives contact with the occupancy figures.

Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Fort Worth or Hawaii?

Hawaii, on occupancy: +11.9 points over the last twelve months against +9.1 points in Fort Worth. Nightly rates fell 8.6% in Fort Worth and rose 1.5% in Hawaii over the same window. One year of movement is a direction, not a trend — weigh it against the regulation picture before treating it as momentum.

Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Fort Worth or Hawaii?

Hawaii, with 22,154 active listings against 1,490 in Fort Worth. Size cuts both ways: a deep market gives you comparables, contractors and an exit, while a thinner one means fewer near-identical rivals competing for the same search results.

How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Fort Worth vs Hawaii?

Hawaii earns more: roughly £10,485 a year for a median listing against £10,310 in Fort Worth. Those are gross booking revenues before cleaning, management, platform fees, furnishing amortisation and tax — budget for a meaningful share of them, and note that a median listing is a median operator, not a good one.

Go deeper on each city

Market guide

Airbnb in Fort Worth →

Occupancy, ADR, neighborhoods, regulation

Market guide

Airbnb in Hawaii →

Occupancy, ADR, neighborhoods, regulation

Ready to buy?

Get a full investment report on either city

Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.

Fort Worth report →Hawaii report →

From the same team

Already hosting? Meet HostPal

An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.

Try HostPal free for 7 days →