Euskadi edges ahead of Valencia on higher occupancy (36% vs 30%).
Head-to-head metrics
| Euskadi | Valencia | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 36% | 30% |
| Median daily rate | £108 | £87 |
| Median RevPAR | £20 | £20 |
| Active listings | 5,060 | 6,234 |
| YoY occupancy | — | — |
| YoY daily rate | — | — |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Euskadi vs Valencia
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Euskadi finishes clearly ahead of Valencia. Nightly rates favour Euskadi: £108 against £87 in Valencia, a 24.5% premium. Euskadi's listings run at 36% occupancy against 30% in Valencia, worth 6 extra points of booked calendar every year. Those gaps are wide enough to survive a normal year's variance.
Euskadi takes both halves of the yield equation, which is less common than it sounds. It charges more per night — £108 against £87 — and still fills more of the year, 36% against 30%. A market that leads on price and utilisation at once is normally one where demand has outrun supply, rather than one where hosts are discounting to keep the calendar busy. RevPAR reflects the double advantage at £20 against £20.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Valencia is not simply the weaker market of the two. Valencia sits at the cheaper end at £87 a night against £108, which lowers the bar for filling shoulder-season dates and usually tracks a lower purchase price too. Its strongest submarket, EL PILAR, clears £45 RevPAR on its own — city medians hide that kind of spread. If your model leans on nightly rate rather than volume, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Euskadi nor Valencia currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Euskadi peaks in August at 61.4% and bottoms in December at 33.9%; Valencia runs from 64.4% in September down to 36.7% in November. Both swing by a similar amount across the year, so neither offers meaningfully steadier cash flow than the other.
Who each suits, then. Euskadi suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry. Valencia answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2025-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 3,306 active Euskadi listings and 3,224 in Valencia.
Frequently asked questions
Is Euskadi or Valencia better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Euskadi or Valencia?
Which has higher nightly rates, Euskadi or Valencia?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Euskadi or Valencia?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Euskadi vs Valencia?
What is the best time of year to rent out an Airbnb in Euskadi or Valencia?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →