Euskadi edges ahead of Menorca on higher occupancy (36% vs 30%), stronger RevPAR (£20 vs £16).
Head-to-head metrics
| Euskadi | Menorca | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 36% | 30% |
| Median daily rate | £108 | £118 |
| Median RevPAR | £20 | £16 |
| Active listings | 5,060 | 2,804 |
| YoY occupancy | — | +16.8 pts |
| YoY daily rate | — | +10.3% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Euskadi vs Menorca
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Euskadi finishes clearly ahead of Menorca. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 27.3% higher in Euskadi: £20 against £16. Euskadi's listings run at 36% occupancy against 30% in Menorca, worth 6 extra points of booked calendar every year. Those gaps are wide enough to survive a normal year's variance.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Menorca is the rate market: £118 a night against £108, some 9.4% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 30% occupancy. Euskadi is the volume market, filling 36% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £20 in Euskadi against £16. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Menorca is not simply the weaker market of the two. Menorca prices modestly above Euskadi — £118 a night to £108, about 9.4%. Menorca's calendar is the flatter of the two — 18.5 points between its best and worst month against 27.5 in Euskadi — which makes debt service easier to underwrite. If your model leans on nightly rate rather than volume, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Euskadi nor Menorca currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Euskadi peaks in August at 61.4% and bottoms in December at 33.9%; Menorca runs from 65.9% in January down to 47.4% in May. Menorca is the steadier of the two at 18.5 points peak-to-trough against 27.5 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Euskadi concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. Euskadi suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry and whose economics survive high turnover — more bookings, more cleans, more guest contact per pound of revenue. Menorca answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal: it is the market for an owner who can hold rate through the shoulder season rather than discounting to fill the calendar. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2025-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 3,306 active Euskadi listings and 2,310 in Menorca.
Frequently asked questions
Is Euskadi or Menorca better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Euskadi or Menorca?
Which has higher nightly rates, Euskadi or Menorca?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Euskadi or Menorca?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Euskadi or Menorca?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Euskadi vs Menorca?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →