Euskadi edges ahead of Mallorca on higher occupancy (19.7% vs 11.5%).
Head-to-head metrics
| Euskadi | Mallorca | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 19.7% | 11.5% |
| Median daily rate | £136 | £247 |
| Median RevPAR | £29 | £39 |
| Active listings | 5,093 | 10,469 |
| YoY occupancy | +3.3 pts | +0 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +26% | +20.7% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Euskadi vs Mallorca
Euskadi finishes clearly ahead of Mallorca on our composite of occupancy, revenue per available night and regulation risk — and it is the calendar rather than the price tag doing the work. Euskadi's listings run at 19.7% occupancy against 11.5% in Mallorca, worth 8.2 extra points of booked calendar every year. The twelve-month direction favours Euskadi too: occupancy there moved +3.3 points while Mallorca moved +0 points. Those gaps are wide enough to survive a normal year's variance.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Mallorca is the rate market: £247 a night against £136, some 81.8% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 11.5% occupancy. Euskadi is the volume market, filling 19.7% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £39 in Mallorca against £29. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Mallorca is not simply the weaker market of the two. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 33.5% higher in Mallorca: £39 against £29. Across a full year the median Mallorca listing grosses £14,076 against £10,552 in Euskadi. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Euskadi nor Mallorca currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Euskadi peaks in September at 57.2% and bottoms in December at 33.4%; Mallorca runs from 54.1% in October down to 36.3% in April. Mallorca is the steadier of the two at 17.8 points peak-to-trough against 23.8 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Euskadi concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. Euskadi suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry and whose economics survive high turnover — more bookings, more cleans, more guest contact per pound of revenue. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Mallorca answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal: it is the market for an owner who can hold rate through the shoulder season rather than discounting to fill the calendar. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2026-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 5,093 active Euskadi listings and 10,469 in Mallorca.
Frequently asked questions
Is Euskadi or Mallorca better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Euskadi or Mallorca?
Which has higher nightly rates, Euskadi or Mallorca?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Euskadi or Mallorca?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Euskadi or Mallorca?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Euskadi vs Mallorca?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →