New Orleans edges ahead of Chicago on higher occupancy (60% vs 54%), stronger RevPAR (£47 vs £36).
Head-to-head metrics
| Chicago | New Orleans | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 54% | 60% |
| Median daily rate | £111 | £103 |
| Median RevPAR | £36 | £47 |
| Active listings | 6,086 | 4,939 |
| YoY occupancy | — | — |
| YoY daily rate | — | — |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Chicago vs New Orleans
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — New Orleans finishes clearly ahead of Chicago. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 32% higher in New Orleans: £47 against £36. New Orleans's listings run at 60% occupancy against 54% in Chicago, worth 6 extra points of booked calendar every year. Those gaps are wide enough to survive a normal year's variance.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Chicago is the rate market: £111 a night against £103, some 7.6% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 54% occupancy. New Orleans is the volume market, filling 60% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £47 in New Orleans against £36. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Chicago is not simply the weaker market of the two. Chicago prices modestly above New Orleans — £111 a night to £103, about 7.6%. Its strongest submarket, Loop, clears £71 RevPAR on its own — city medians hide that kind of spread. If your model leans on nightly rate rather than volume, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Chicago nor New Orleans currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Chicago peaks in September at 51.4% and bottoms in February at 25.2%; New Orleans runs from 52.2% in August down to 29.9% in December. New Orleans is the steadier of the two at 22.3 points peak-to-trough against 26.2 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Chicago concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. Chicago suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry and who can hold rate through the shoulder season rather than discounting to fill the calendar. New Orleans answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal: it is the market for an owner whose economics survive high turnover — more bookings, more cleans, more guest contact per pound of revenue. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2025-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 2,560 active Chicago listings and 1,475 in New Orleans.
Frequently asked questions
Is Chicago or New Orleans better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Chicago or New Orleans?
Which has higher nightly rates, Chicago or New Orleans?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Chicago or New Orleans?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Chicago vs New Orleans?
What is the best time of year to rent out an Airbnb in Chicago or New Orleans?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →