Ghent edges ahead of Brussels on higher occupancy (36% vs 32%), stronger RevPAR (£24 vs £21).
Head-to-head metrics
| Brussels | Ghent | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 32% | 36% |
| Median daily rate | £77 | £85 |
| Median RevPAR | £21 | £24 |
| Active listings | 4,587 | 1,127 |
| YoY occupancy | +2.4 pts | +9.7 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +1.1% | +0% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Brussels vs Ghent
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Ghent finishes narrowly ahead of Brussels. Ghent turns its rate and occupancy into £24 per available night against £21 in Brussels, a 13.7% edge on the only yield figure that nets the empty nights out. The twelve-month direction favours Ghent too: occupancy there moved +9.7 points while Brussels moved +2.4 points. The margin is thin enough that a single strong year in Brussels would close it, so treat the ordering as a lean rather than a verdict.
Ghent takes both halves of the yield equation, which is less common than it sounds. It charges more per night — £85 against £77 — and still fills more of the year, 36% against 32%. A market that leads on price and utilisation at once is normally one where demand has outrun supply, rather than one where hosts are discounting to keep the calendar busy. RevPAR reflects the double advantage at £24 against £21.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Brussels is not simply the weaker market of the two. Brussels is the deeper market at 4,587 active listings against 1,127, which usually means better comparables going in and a wider buyer pool coming out. Brussels sits at the cheaper end at £77 a night against £85, which lowers the bar for filling shoulder-season dates and usually tracks a lower purchase price too. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Brussels nor Ghent currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Brussels peaks in October at 65.2% and bottoms in February at 41.1%; Ghent runs from 65.7% in October down to 39.9% in February. Both swing by a similar amount across the year, so neither offers meaningfully steadier cash flow than the other.
Who each suits, then. Brussels suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry. Ghent answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2025-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 2,433 active Brussels listings and 579 in Ghent.
Frequently asked questions
Is Brussels or Ghent better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Brussels or Ghent?
Which has higher nightly rates, Brussels or Ghent?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Brussels or Ghent?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Brussels or Ghent?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Brussels vs Ghent?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →