Ghent edges ahead of Antwerp on higher occupancy (27.9% vs 21.4%), stronger RevPAR (£38 vs £28).
Head-to-head metrics
| Antwerp | Ghent | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 21.4% | 27.9% |
| Median daily rate | £112 | £122 |
| Median RevPAR | £28 | £38 |
| Active listings | 1,768 | 1,116 |
| YoY occupancy | +0 pts | +1.6 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +44.5% | +43.6% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Antwerp vs Ghent
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Ghent finishes clearly ahead of Antwerp. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 34.8% higher in Ghent: £38 against £28. Ghent's listings run at 27.9% occupancy against 21.4% in Antwerp, worth 6.5 extra points of booked calendar every year. Those gaps are wide enough to survive a normal year's variance.
Ghent takes both halves of the yield equation, which is less common than it sounds. It charges more per night — £122 against £112 — and still fills more of the year, 27.9% against 21.4%. A market that leads on price and utilisation at once is normally one where demand has outrun supply, rather than one where hosts are discounting to keep the calendar busy. RevPAR reflects the double advantage at £38 against £28.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Antwerp is not simply the weaker market of the two. Antwerp is the deeper market at 1,768 active listings against 1,116, which usually means better comparables going in and a wider buyer pool coming out. Antwerp sits at the cheaper end at £112 a night against £122, which lowers the bar for filling shoulder-season dates and usually tracks a lower purchase price too. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Antwerp nor Ghent currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Antwerp peaks in July at 53.3% and bottoms in January at 33.8%; Ghent runs from 63% in October down to 40.6% in February. Both swing by a similar amount across the year, so neither offers meaningfully steadier cash flow than the other.
Who each suits, then. Antwerp suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry. Ghent answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2026-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 1,768 active Antwerp listings and 1,116 in Ghent.
Frequently asked questions
Is Antwerp or Ghent better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Antwerp or Ghent?
Which has higher nightly rates, Antwerp or Ghent?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Antwerp or Ghent?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Antwerp or Ghent?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Antwerp vs Ghent?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →