Antwerp and Ghent score similarly on the metrics that matter most for short-term rental returns. The right pick depends on whether you optimise for yield (lower regulation risk, higher RevPAR) or capital growth.
Head-to-head metrics
| Antwerp | Ghent | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 36% | 36% |
| Median daily rate | £77 | £85 |
| Median RevPAR | £18 | £24 |
| Active listings | 1,831 | 1,127 |
| YoY occupancy | +13 pts | +9.7 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +4.6% | +0% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Antwerp vs Ghent
There is no clean winner between Antwerp and Ghent. Antwerp posts 36% occupancy and £18 RevPAR; Ghent posts 36% occupancy and £24 RevPAR. Weighted together with regulation risk the two finish inside the margin we are willing to call, which is the honest answer rather than an evasive one — a scoring gap this small would flip on the next data refresh. When markets are this close the decision stops being about the market and starts being about the deal: what you pay, what it costs to run, and how quickly you could exit.
On the mechanics of the yield the two are hard to separate. Antwerp runs 36% occupancy at £77 a night; Ghent runs 36% at £85. That leaves RevPAR almost level too — £24 against £18 — so operating quality, not market selection, is what will decide your return between these two.
A tie does not mean the two are interchangeable — it means each holds something the other does not. Antwerp is the deeper market at 1,831 active listings against 1,127, which usually means better comparables going in and a wider buyer pool coming out. Across a full year the median Ghent listing grosses £8,775 against £6,426 in Antwerp. Pick the one whose advantage matches how you intend to operate, because the composite score will not do that job for you.
Neither Antwerp nor Ghent currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Antwerp peaks in October at 60.7% and bottoms in February at 38.3%; Ghent runs from 65.7% in October down to 39.9% in February. Antwerp is the steadier of the two at 22.4 points peak-to-trough against 25.8 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Ghent concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. Antwerp suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry and whose economics survive high turnover — more bookings, more cleans, more guest contact per pound of revenue. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Ghent answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal: it is the market for an owner who can hold rate through the shoulder season rather than discounting to fill the calendar. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2025-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 1,049 active Antwerp listings and 579 in Ghent.
Frequently asked questions
Is Antwerp or Ghent better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Antwerp or Ghent?
Which has higher nightly rates, Antwerp or Ghent?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Antwerp or Ghent?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Antwerp or Ghent?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Antwerp vs Ghent?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →