Seattle edges ahead of Washington Dc on higher occupancy (32.9% vs 31.2%), stronger RevPAR (£55 vs £47).
Head-to-head metrics
| Seattle | Washington Dc | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 32.9% | 31.2% |
| Median daily rate | £184 | £167 |
| Median RevPAR | £55 | £47 |
| Active listings | 5,958 | 4,661 |
| YoY occupancy | -1.6 pts | -1.7 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +60.9% | +71.5% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Seattle vs Washington Dc
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Seattle finishes narrowly ahead of Washington Dc. Seattle turns its rate and occupancy into £55 per available night against £47 in Washington Dc, a 16.2% edge on the only yield figure that nets the empty nights out. Nightly rates favour Seattle: £184 against £167 in Washington Dc, a 10.6% premium. The margin is thin enough that a single strong year in Washington Dc would close it, so treat the ordering as a lean rather than a verdict.
Seattle takes both halves of the yield equation, which is less common than it sounds. It charges more per night — £184 against £167 — and still fills more of the year, 32.9% against 31.2%. A market that leads on price and utilisation at once is normally one where demand has outrun supply, rather than one where hosts are discounting to keep the calendar busy. RevPAR reflects the double advantage at £55 against £47.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Washington Dc is not simply the weaker market of the two. Nightly rates are also climbing faster in Washington Dc, +71.5% over the last year against +60.9% in Seattle. Washington Dc sits at the cheaper end at £167 a night against £184, which lowers the bar for filling shoulder-season dates and usually tracks a lower purchase price too. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Seattle nor Washington Dc currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Seattle peaks in September at 59.2% and bottoms in February at 31.4%; Washington Dc runs from 52.1% in September down to 24.7% in February. Both swing by a similar amount across the year, so neither offers meaningfully steadier cash flow than the other.
Who each suits, then. Seattle suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry. Washington Dc answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal. It is the contrarian side: buying it means buying a market that has cooled. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2026-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 5,958 active Seattle listings and 4,661 in Washington Dc.
Frequently asked questions
Is Seattle or Washington Dc better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Seattle or Washington Dc?
Which has higher nightly rates, Seattle or Washington Dc?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Seattle or Washington Dc?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Seattle or Washington Dc?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Seattle vs Washington Dc?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →