Ottawa edges ahead of Victoria on higher occupancy (60% vs 48%).
Head-to-head metrics
| Ottawa | Victoria | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 60% | 48% |
| Median daily rate | £64 | £93 |
| Median RevPAR | £24 | £36 |
| Active listings | 1,888 | 2,586 |
| YoY occupancy | +25.5 pts | +13.5 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +2.8% | +0.6% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Ottawa vs Victoria
Ottawa finishes clearly ahead of Victoria on our composite of occupancy, revenue per available night and regulation risk — and it is the calendar rather than the price tag doing the work. Ottawa sells 12 more points of its calendar — 60% median occupancy against 48% in Victoria. The twelve-month direction favours Ottawa too: occupancy there moved +25.5 points while Victoria moved +13.5 points. Those gaps are wide enough to survive a normal year's variance.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Victoria is the rate market: £93 a night against £64, some 45.5% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 48% occupancy. Ottawa is the volume market, filling 60% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £36 in Victoria against £24. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Victoria is not simply the weaker market of the two. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 51.9% higher in Victoria: £36 against £24. Across a full year the median Victoria listing grosses £13,311 against £8,770 in Ottawa. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Ottawa nor Victoria currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Ottawa peaks in September at 53.8% and bottoms in February at 29.6%; Victoria runs from 56.6% in October down to 39.6% in May. Victoria is the steadier of the two at 17 points peak-to-trough against 24.2 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Ottawa concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. Ottawa suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry and whose economics survive high turnover — more bookings, more cleans, more guest contact per pound of revenue. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Victoria answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal: it is the market for an owner who can hold rate through the shoulder season rather than discounting to fill the calendar. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2025-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 707 active Ottawa listings and 866 in Victoria.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ottawa or Victoria better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Ottawa or Victoria?
Which has higher nightly rates, Ottawa or Victoria?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Ottawa or Victoria?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Ottawa or Victoria?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Ottawa vs Victoria?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →