Ottawa edges ahead of Vancouver on higher occupancy (60% vs 42%).
Head-to-head metrics
| Ottawa | Vancouver | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 60% | 42% |
| Median daily rate | £64 | £85 |
| Median RevPAR | £24 | £36 |
| Active listings | 1,888 | 3,993 |
| YoY occupancy | +25.5 pts | -7.3 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +2.8% | -2% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Ottawa vs Vancouver
Ottawa finishes decisively ahead of Vancouver on our composite of occupancy, revenue per available night and regulation risk — and it is the calendar rather than the price tag doing the work. Ottawa sells 18 more points of its calendar — 60% median occupancy against 42% in Vancouver. The twelve-month direction favours Ottawa too: occupancy there moved +25.5 points while Vancouver moved −7.3 points. That is not a rounding difference, and it compounds over a hold period.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Vancouver is the rate market: £85 a night against £64, some 33.6% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 42% occupancy. Ottawa is the volume market, filling 60% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £36 in Vancouver against £24. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Vancouver is not simply the weaker market of the two. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 50.7% higher in Vancouver: £36 against £24. Across a full year the median Vancouver listing grosses £13,207 against £8,770 in Ottawa. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Ottawa nor Vancouver currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Ottawa peaks in September at 53.8% and bottoms in February at 29.6%; Vancouver runs from 62.3% in September down to 38.4% in January. Both swing by a similar amount across the year, so neither offers meaningfully steadier cash flow than the other.
Who each suits, then. Ottawa suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry and whose economics survive high turnover — more bookings, more cleans, more guest contact per pound of revenue. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Vancouver answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal: it is the market for an owner who can hold rate through the shoulder season rather than discounting to fill the calendar. It is the contrarian side: buying it means buying a market that has cooled. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 707 active Ottawa listings and 1,206 in Vancouver.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ottawa or Vancouver better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Ottawa or Vancouver?
Which has higher nightly rates, Ottawa or Vancouver?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Ottawa or Vancouver?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Ottawa or Vancouver?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Ottawa vs Vancouver?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →