Oakland vs Rhode Island: which is better for Airbnb investment? (2026)

Bottom line

Rhode Island edges ahead of Oakland on higher occupancy (42% vs 36%), stronger RevPAR (£39 vs £18).

Head-to-head metrics

	Oakland	Rhode Island
Median occupancy	36%	42%
Median daily rate	£85	£206
Median RevPAR	£18	£39
Active listings	1,449	4,262
YoY occupancy	+14.1 pts	+22.3 pts
YoY daily rate	-0.9%	+0.4%
Regulation risk	—	—
Annual night cap	None	None
License required	No	No

Full analysis: Oakland vs Rhode Island

On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Rhode Island finishes clearly ahead of Oakland. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 123.8% higher in Rhode Island: £39 against £18. Rhode Island commands 143.9% more per night, £206 against £85. Those gaps are wide enough to survive a normal year's variance.

Rhode Island takes both halves of the yield equation, which is less common than it sounds. It charges more per night — £206 against £85 — and still fills more of the year, 42% against 36%. A market that leads on price and utilisation at once is normally one where demand has outrun supply, rather than one where hosts are discounting to keep the calendar busy. RevPAR reflects the double advantage at £39 against £18.

That verdict needs a caveat, because Oakland is not simply the weaker market of the two. Oakland is the less crowded of the two — 1,449 active listings to 4,262 — so a well-run property has fewer near-identical rivals to out-rank. Oakland sits at the cheaper end at £85 a night against £206, which lowers the bar for filling shoulder-season dates and usually tracks a lower purchase price too. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.

Neither Oakland nor Rhode Island currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.

The two calendars also behave differently. Oakland peaks in September at 60.8% and bottoms in February at 35.5%; Rhode Island runs from 60% in October down to 45.6% in June. Rhode Island is the steadier of the two at 14.4 points peak-to-trough against 25.3 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Oakland concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.

Who each suits, then. Oakland suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry. Rhode Island answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2025-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 886 active Oakland listings and 2,776 in Rhode Island.

Frequently asked questions

Is Oakland or Rhode Island better for Airbnb investment?

Rhode Island, on the data we track. It leads on stronger RevPAR (£39 vs £18), a higher nightly rate (£206 vs £85), and the better occupancy trend (+22.3 points vs +14.1 points year over year). Oakland is not the weak side of this pair, though — it wins on a thinner competitive field (1,449 vs 4,262 active listings).

Which has higher occupancy, Oakland or Rhode Island?

Rhode Island, at 42% median occupancy against 36% in Oakland — a gap of 6 points. That is a real but modest edge; a well-run listing in Oakland can close most of it. Over the last twelve months Oakland gained 14.1 points and Rhode Island gained 22.3 points, so the gap is widening.

Which has higher nightly rates, Oakland or Rhode Island?

Rhode Island, at £206 a night against £85 in Oakland — roughly 143.9% more. Revenue per available night agrees rather than contradicts: £39 in Rhode Island against £18, so the rate premium survives contact with the occupancy figures.

Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Oakland or Rhode Island?

Rhode Island, on occupancy: +22.3 points over the last twelve months against +14.1 points in Oakland. Nightly rates fell 0.9% in Oakland and held flat in Rhode Island over the same window. One year of movement is a direction, not a trend — weigh it against the regulation picture before treating it as momentum.

Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Oakland or Rhode Island?

Rhode Island, with 4,262 active listings against 1,449 in Oakland. Size cuts both ways: a deep market gives you comparables, contractors and an exit, while a thinner one means fewer near-identical rivals competing for the same search results.

How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Oakland vs Rhode Island?

Rhode Island earns more: roughly £14,336 a year for a median listing against £6,404 in Oakland. Those are gross booking revenues before cleaning, management, platform fees, furnishing amortisation and tax — budget for a meaningful share of them, and note that a median listing is a median operator, not a good one.

Go deeper on each city

Market guide

Airbnb in Oakland →

Occupancy, ADR, neighborhoods, regulation

Market guide

Airbnb in Rhode Island →

Occupancy, ADR, neighborhoods, regulation

Ready to buy?

Get a full investment report on either city

Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.

Oakland report →Rhode Island report →

From the same team

Already hosting? Meet HostPal

An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.

Try HostPal free for 7 days →