New Orleans edges ahead of San Francisco on higher occupancy (49.3% vs 36.2%), stronger RevPAR (£76 vs £75).
Head-to-head metrics
| New Orleans | San Francisco | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 49.3% | 36.2% |
| Median daily rate | £175 | £194 |
| Median RevPAR | £76 | £75 |
| Active listings | 4,619 | 4,543 |
| YoY occupancy | -5.5 pts | +3 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +68.8% | +60.8% |
| Regulation risk | — | high |
| Annual night cap | None | 90 |
| License required | No | Yes |
Full analysis: New Orleans vs San Francisco
New Orleans finishes decisively ahead of San Francisco on our composite of occupancy, revenue per available night and regulation risk — and it is the calendar rather than the price tag doing the work. New Orleans sells 13.1 more points of its calendar — 49.3% median occupancy against 36.2% in San Francisco. New Orleans's calendar is the flatter of the two — 18.6 points between its best and worst month against 27.6 in San Francisco — which makes debt service easier to underwrite. That is not a rounding difference, and it compounds over a hold period.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. San Francisco is the rate market: £194 a night against £175, some 11.3% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 36.2% occupancy. New Orleans is the volume market, filling 49.3% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £76 in New Orleans against £75. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because San Francisco is not simply the weaker market of the two. The twelve-month direction favours San Francisco too: occupancy there moved +3 points while New Orleans moved −5.5 points. Its strongest submarket, Presidio Heights, clears £242 RevPAR on its own — city medians hide that kind of spread. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
We hold a verified regulation record for only one side of this pairing. San Francisco caps entire-home letting at 90 nights a year and requires a licence, on a high risk rating. New Orleans should be read as unverified rather than unregulated: check the local authority's own register before you underwrite anything there.
The two calendars also behave differently. New Orleans peaks in September at 49.2% and bottoms in December at 30.6%; San Francisco runs from 67.4% in September down to 39.8% in February. New Orleans is the steadier of the two at 18.6 points peak-to-trough against 27.6 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while San Francisco concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. New Orleans suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry and whose economics survive high turnover — more bookings, more cleans, more guest contact per pound of revenue. It is the contrarian side: buying it means buying a market that has cooled. San Francisco suits an owner who expects to use the property personally for part of the year, or to run a hybrid calendar around the 90-night ceiling and who can hold rate through the shoulder season rather than discounting to fill the calendar. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2026-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 4,619 active New Orleans listings and 4,543 in San Francisco.
Frequently asked questions
Is New Orleans or San Francisco better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, New Orleans or San Francisco?
Which has higher nightly rates, New Orleans or San Francisco?
Is New Orleans or San Francisco riskier for Airbnb regulation?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, New Orleans or San Francisco?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, New Orleans or San Francisco?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →