Vancouver edges ahead of New Brunswick on higher occupancy (36.2% vs 19.7%), stronger RevPAR (£55 vs £26).
Head-to-head metrics
| New Brunswick | Vancouver | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 19.7% | 36.2% |
| Median daily rate | £120 | £175 |
| Median RevPAR | £26 | £55 |
| Active listings | 3,765 | 4,491 |
| YoY occupancy | +0.5 pts | -13.1 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +38.1% | +55.2% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: New Brunswick vs Vancouver
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Vancouver finishes decisively ahead of New Brunswick. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 110.7% higher in Vancouver: £55 against £26. Vancouver sells 16.5 more points of its calendar — 36.2% median occupancy against 19.7% in New Brunswick. That is not a rounding difference, and it compounds over a hold period.
Vancouver takes both halves of the yield equation, which is less common than it sounds. It charges more per night — £175 against £120 — and still fills more of the year, 36.2% against 19.7%. A market that leads on price and utilisation at once is normally one where demand has outrun supply, rather than one where hosts are discounting to keep the calendar busy. RevPAR reflects the double advantage at £55 against £26.
That verdict needs a caveat, because New Brunswick is not simply the weaker market of the two. The twelve-month direction favours New Brunswick too: occupancy there moved +0.5 points while Vancouver moved −13.1 points. New Brunswick's calendar is the flatter of the two — 13.8 points between its best and worst month against 26.8 in Vancouver — which makes debt service easier to underwrite. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither New Brunswick nor Vancouver currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. New Brunswick peaks in October at 52.1% and bottoms in June at 38.3%; Vancouver runs from 66.9% in September down to 40.1% in November. New Brunswick is the steadier of the two at 13.8 points peak-to-trough against 26.8 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Vancouver concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. New Brunswick suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Vancouver answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal. It is the contrarian side: buying it means buying a market that has cooled. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2026-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 3,765 active New Brunswick listings and 4,491 in Vancouver.
Frequently asked questions
Is New Brunswick or Vancouver better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, New Brunswick or Vancouver?
Which has higher nightly rates, New Brunswick or Vancouver?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, New Brunswick or Vancouver?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, New Brunswick or Vancouver?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in New Brunswick vs Vancouver?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →