Madrid edges ahead of Menorca on higher occupancy (36% vs 30%), stronger RevPAR (£27 vs £16).
Head-to-head metrics
| Madrid | Menorca | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 36% | 30% |
| Median daily rate | £94 | £118 |
| Median RevPAR | £27 | £16 |
| Active listings | 16,015 | 2,804 |
| YoY occupancy | — | +16.8 pts |
| YoY daily rate | — | +10.3% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Madrid vs Menorca
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Madrid finishes clearly ahead of Menorca. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 72.6% higher in Madrid: £27 against £16. Madrid's listings run at 36% occupancy against 30% in Menorca, worth 6 extra points of booked calendar every year. Those gaps are wide enough to survive a normal year's variance.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Menorca is the rate market: £118 a night against £94, some 25.2% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 30% occupancy. Madrid is the volume market, filling 36% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £27 in Madrid against £16. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Menorca is not simply the weaker market of the two. Menorca commands 25.2% more per night, £118 against £94. Menorca's calendar is the flatter of the two — 18.5 points between its best and worst month against 25.8 in Madrid — which makes debt service easier to underwrite. If your model leans on nightly rate rather than volume, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Madrid nor Menorca currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Madrid peaks in September at 71.3% and bottoms in February at 45.5%; Menorca runs from 65.9% in January down to 47.4% in May. Menorca is the steadier of the two at 18.5 points peak-to-trough against 25.8 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Madrid concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. Madrid suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry and whose economics survive high turnover — more bookings, more cleans, more guest contact per pound of revenue. Menorca answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal: it is the market for an owner who can hold rate through the shoulder season rather than discounting to fill the calendar. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2025-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 7,469 active Madrid listings and 2,310 in Menorca.
Frequently asked questions
Is Madrid or Menorca better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Madrid or Menorca?
Which has higher nightly rates, Madrid or Menorca?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Madrid or Menorca?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Madrid or Menorca?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Madrid vs Menorca?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →