New York City edges ahead of Los Angeles on higher occupancy (60% vs 54%), stronger RevPAR (£47 vs £34).
Head-to-head metrics
| Los Angeles | New York City | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 54% | 60% |
| Median daily rate | £122 | £117 |
| Median RevPAR | £34 | £47 |
| Active listings | 23,969 | 10,918 |
| YoY occupancy | — | — |
| YoY daily rate | — | — |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Los Angeles vs New York City
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — New York City finishes clearly ahead of Los Angeles. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 38.7% higher in New York City: £47 against £34. New York City's listings run at 60% occupancy against 54% in Los Angeles, worth 6 extra points of booked calendar every year. Those gaps are wide enough to survive a normal year's variance.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Los Angeles is the rate market: £122 a night against £117, some 4.1% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 54% occupancy. New York City is the volume market, filling 60% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £47 in New York City against £34. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Los Angeles is not simply the weaker market of the two. Los Angeles is the deeper market at 23,969 active listings against 10,918, which usually means better comparables going in and a wider buyer pool coming out. Its strongest submarket, Sepulveda Basin, clears £202 RevPAR on its own — city medians hide that kind of spread. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Los Angeles nor New York City currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Los Angeles peaks in August at 52.2% and bottoms in January at 30.5%; New York City runs from 67% in November down to 47.3% in January. Both swing by a similar amount across the year, so neither offers meaningfully steadier cash flow than the other.
Who each suits, then. Los Angeles suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry. New York City answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2025-11, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 11,708 active Los Angeles listings and 3,530 in New York City.
Frequently asked questions
Is Los Angeles or New York City better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Los Angeles or New York City?
Which has higher nightly rates, Los Angeles or New York City?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Los Angeles or New York City?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Los Angeles vs New York City?
What is the best time of year to rent out an Airbnb in Los Angeles or New York City?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →