Madrid edges ahead of Girona on higher occupancy (37.8% vs 8.2%), stronger RevPAR (£46 vs £16).
Head-to-head metrics
| Girona | Madrid | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 8.2% | 37.8% |
| Median daily rate | £140 | £133 |
| Median RevPAR | £16 | £46 |
| Active listings | 14,216 | 16,115 |
| YoY occupancy | +0 pts | +6.6 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +36.9% | +40.5% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Girona vs Madrid
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Madrid finishes decisively ahead of Girona. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 193% higher in Madrid: £46 against £16. Madrid sells 29.6 more points of its calendar — 37.8% median occupancy against 8.2% in Girona. That is not a rounding difference, and it compounds over a hold period.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Girona is the rate market: £140 a night against £133, some 5.3% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 8.2% occupancy. Madrid is the volume market, filling 37.8% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £46 in Madrid against £16. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Girona is not simply the weaker market of the two. Girona's calendar is the flatter of the two — 16 points between its best and worst month against 32.4 in Madrid — which makes debt service easier to underwrite. Its strongest submarket, Vilanant, clears £97 RevPAR on its own — city medians hide that kind of spread. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Girona nor Madrid currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Girona peaks in August at 60.4% and bottoms in November at 44.4%; Madrid runs from 69.5% in October down to 37.1% in February. Girona is the steadier of the two at 16 points peak-to-trough against 32.4 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Madrid concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. Girona suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry and who can hold rate through the shoulder season rather than discounting to fill the calendar. Madrid answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal: it is the market for an owner whose economics survive high turnover — more bookings, more cleans, more guest contact per pound of revenue. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2026-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 14,216 active Girona listings and 16,115 in Madrid.
Frequently asked questions
Is Girona or Madrid better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Girona or Madrid?
Which has higher nightly rates, Girona or Madrid?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Girona or Madrid?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Girona or Madrid?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Girona vs Madrid?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →