Madrid edges ahead of Girona on higher occupancy (36% vs 24%), stronger RevPAR (£27 vs £11).
Head-to-head metrics
| Girona | Madrid | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 24% | 36% |
| Median daily rate | £105 | £94 |
| Median RevPAR | £11 | £27 |
| Active listings | 13,313 | 16,015 |
| YoY occupancy | — | — |
| YoY daily rate | — | — |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Girona vs Madrid
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Madrid finishes decisively ahead of Girona. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 141.1% higher in Madrid: £27 against £11. Madrid sells 12 more points of its calendar — 36% median occupancy against 24% in Girona. That is not a rounding difference, and it compounds over a hold period.
The two markets reach their revenue by different routes, which is what makes this pairing worth reading rather than just tabulating. Girona is the rate market: £105 a night against £94, some 11.7% more, but it converts fewer of those nights at 24% occupancy. Madrid is the volume market, filling 36% of its calendar at a lower headline price. Revenue per available night settles it: £27 in Madrid against £11. Rate is what you advertise; RevPAR is what you bank.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Girona is not simply the weaker market of the two. Girona's calendar is the flatter of the two — 13 points between its best and worst month against 25.8 in Madrid — which makes debt service easier to underwrite. Its strongest submarket, Vallfogona de Ripollès, clears £134 RevPAR on its own — city medians hide that kind of spread. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Girona nor Madrid currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Girona peaks in December at 53.3% and bottoms in May at 40.3%; Madrid runs from 71.3% in September down to 45.5% in February. Girona is the steadier of the two at 13 points peak-to-trough against 25.8 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Madrid concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. Girona suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry and who can hold rate through the shoulder season rather than discounting to fill the calendar. Madrid answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal: it is the market for an owner whose economics survive high turnover — more bookings, more cleans, more guest contact per pound of revenue. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 11,424 active Girona listings and 7,469 in Madrid.
Frequently asked questions
Is Girona or Madrid better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Girona or Madrid?
Which has higher nightly rates, Girona or Madrid?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Girona or Madrid?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Girona vs Madrid?
What is the best time of year to rent out an Airbnb in Girona or Madrid?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →