Edinburgh edges ahead of Bristol on higher occupancy (36% vs 30%), stronger RevPAR (£53 vs £17).
Head-to-head metrics
| Bristol | Edinburgh | |
|---|---|---|
| Median occupancy | 30% | 36% |
| Median daily rate | £95 | £156 |
| Median RevPAR | £17 | £53 |
| Active listings | 2,090 | 4,407 |
| YoY occupancy | +3.7 pts | -15 pts |
| YoY daily rate | +1.1% | -2.5% |
| Regulation risk | — | — |
| Annual night cap | None | None |
| License required | No | No |
Full analysis: Bristol vs Edinburgh
On the money side of this comparison — what a listing actually earns against the nights it has available — Edinburgh finishes clearly ahead of Bristol. Revenue per available night — rate and occupancy combined, the figure that actually reaches an owner — is 204% higher in Edinburgh: £53 against £17. Edinburgh commands 64.2% more per night, £156 against £95. Those gaps are wide enough to survive a normal year's variance.
Edinburgh takes both halves of the yield equation, which is less common than it sounds. It charges more per night — £156 against £95 — and still fills more of the year, 36% against 30%. A market that leads on price and utilisation at once is normally one where demand has outrun supply, rather than one where hosts are discounting to keep the calendar busy. RevPAR reflects the double advantage at £53 against £17.
That verdict needs a caveat, because Bristol is not simply the weaker market of the two. The twelve-month direction favours Bristol too: occupancy there moved +3.7 points while Edinburgh moved −15 points. Bristol's calendar is the flatter of the two — 15.6 points between its best and worst month against 27.1 in Edinburgh — which makes debt service easier to underwrite. If your model leans on that dimension, the ordering above can reasonably flip.
Neither Bristol nor Edinburgh currently has a verified short-term rental regulation record in our register, so the comparison above is a yield comparison only. Regulation is the single largest source of downside in this asset class — an unverified market is an unpriced risk, not an absent one.
The two calendars also behave differently. Bristol peaks in September at 61.9% and bottoms in March at 46.3%; Edinburgh runs from 69.5% in September down to 42.4% in January. Bristol is the steadier of the two at 15.6 points peak-to-trough against 27.1 — easier to underwrite against a mortgage — while Edinburgh concentrates its return into a shorter window and rewards operators who price the peak aggressively instead of holding a flat rate all year.
Who each suits, then. Bristol suits buyers who want a conventional, lightly regulated entry. It is also the momentum side of this pair. Edinburgh answers to the same regulatory profile, so the split between them is operational rather than legal. It is the contrarian side: buying it means buying a market that has cooled. Every figure above comes from the same Inside Airbnb snapshot pipeline on both sides, dated 2025-09, filtered to listings with at least one booking in the last twelve months. Occupancy medians are drawn from 1,330 active Bristol listings and 1,788 in Edinburgh.
Frequently asked questions
Is Bristol or Edinburgh better for Airbnb investment?
Which has higher occupancy, Bristol or Edinburgh?
Which has higher nightly rates, Bristol or Edinburgh?
Which has stronger year-over-year growth, Bristol or Edinburgh?
Which is the bigger Airbnb market, Bristol or Edinburgh?
How much can you earn from an Airbnb in Bristol vs Edinburgh?
Go deeper on each city
Get a full investment report on either city
Property-level financials, stress tests, and an AI verdict — £19 each.
Already hosting? Meet HostPal
An AI concierge that answers your guests on WhatsApp 24/7 — in 50+ languages, from your own guidebook and house rules. Emergencies get escalated to you; the WiFi password doesn't. Live in under 10 minutes.
Try HostPal free for 7 days →